Cosmic Teleology and the Crisis of the Sciences Essay example -- Philo

Cosmic Teleology and the Crisis of the apprehensionsABSTRACT This paper analyzes recent work from within the corporeal sciences which argue for the emergence of a forward-looking paradigm capable of merge the sciences and demonstrating the ultimate meaningfulness of the universe. I argue that while there is powerful prove for cosmic teleology, the works in question do non compensate a new paradigm and neither unify science nor adequately accommodate the deduction in question, but rather attempt to rank new wine in old skins. As Aristotle demonstrated, only teleological argumentation offers a complete scientific explanation, and authentic teleology is effectively rule out by the hegemonic scientific paradigm which gives first place to mathematical formalism-something which makes possible rigorous description but non authentic explanation. This does not mean returning to Aristotelian science, but rather exploring the road not taken when Aristotelian science entered a crisis at the end of the chivalrous period generalizing the concept of teleology so that it can accommodate both the forcible (especially astronomical) evidence which created problems for Aristotelian science long before Galileo and Kepler, and account teleologically for much(prenominal) phenomena as chaos and disintegration. The work of scientists like Gal-Or, Bohm, and Prigogine provides important resources for moving in this direction, but a more explicit option for teleology is necessary if the evidence is to be accommodated and the internal contradictions of the existing paradigm to be resolved. There has been healthy discussion in recent years regarding the emergence of a new scientific paradigm centered on holism and self-organization. This discussion has been motivated... ...ohn and Sylla, Edith. 1978 The Science of Motion, in David Lindberg, editor, Science in the Middle Ages. Chicago University of Chicago Press.Pedersen, Olaf. 1978. Astronomy, in David Lindberg, editor, Sci ence in the Middle Ages. Chicago University of Chicago Press.Pines, David (ed.). 1987. Emerging Syntheses in Science, new-made York Addison Wesley.Prigogine, Ilya. 1977. Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems, with Nicolis, G. New York Wiley.________. 1979. From Being to Becoming duration and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. New York Freeman.________. 1984. Order Out of Chaos, with Stengers, I. New York Basic.________. 1988. An Alternative to Quantum Theory, with Tomio Petrosky, in Physica 147A 461-486.Spinoza, Baruch. 1677/1955. Ethics. New York DoverTipler, Frank. 1994. The Physics of Immortality, New York Doubleday