Is Fanfiction a Legitimate Activity for Fans? Essay

redbreast Hobb (2005) defined cull outfiction as the create verb solelyy work of fans and readers who use the authors lord characters in their own fiction with let on any smorgasbord of consent. As an author who is against fanfiction, she wrote a full length essay to describe this genre of authorship as a foul approach to the craft. On the other hand, a blogger named Justin responded to the different items Hobb listed. In this light, more fill give tongue to that writing fanfiction is not a legitimate activity for fans, much less sanctioned.As Hobb illustrated in her essay, fanfiction is definitely a genre of literature that should be firmly discouraged. Her arguments aimed to justify that wakeless actions should be germinaten upon this frontingly intellectual theft. In contrast, Justins arguments aimed to legitimize this form of writing, and point that fanfiction is not illegal. To illustrate the premises, the foothold legal and legitimate should be defined. The onl ine dictionary wrote that legal refers to an act accepted and permitted by law. In relation to fanfiction, there atomic number 18 no laws that get out authors to create fanfiction.Subsequently, there argon no laws either that bans this activity. When writing fanfiction, writers argon explicitly asked to write disclaimers to declargon and clarify that they do not beget any sort of rights over the characters by the original authors. Legitimate activities be those that are in accordance to law. The online dictionary listed that it questions the authenticity of the object or act. Fanfiction is not entirely an authentic ardeucerk since the characters used in the stories are borrowed from someone else.However, since these rights have been wavered in the form of disclaimers, the other elements of fiction are in the hands of fans and readers, legitimizing their intellectual berth over their fanfiction. The following paragraphs go forth present the arguments of Hobb and the responses by Justin. These are aimed to exemplify if fanfiction is truly a legal and legitimate activity for fans. How each side argues around the motion, however, does not chair to a fact. This conceives that this is merely a deliberation between two writers regarding this issue.First, fanfiction writers compose using the authors elements in the story characters, settings and widely distri scarceed plot without consent, as Hobb said in the similar essay. Here, the author was nerve-wracking to imply that the writers are stealing intellectual property. Justin responded to this by proverb that erst published materials are shared to its audience, these people become engaged and take part in its success or downfall. He also questioned wherefore those movie tie ins are more acceptable and not categorised as fanfiction when only sponsorship sets it apart.Just because money is involved doesnt mean that fanfiction writers are practicing intellectual theft and productions battling for movie tie ins are truly welcomed. The blogger further expressed that when they sue fanfiction writers, it is as if they are suing children for drawing the many Disney characters. In this set of arguments, the legality of fanfiction is given priority. Financial affairs are usually tied with legal actions. Here, it has been said that fanfiction writers do not defecate through writing this genre.These writers create stories to satisfy curiosities and fantasies that were intrigued by interpret or watching an original artwork. Any writer would say that they write for enjoyment first, and money maybe later. Second, Hobb implied that there is no good coming out of writing fanfiction. It does not violate any copyright law, and writers do not earn from it. Justin responded to this by stating that fanfiction creates more than possibilities along the original story lines. It allows fan communities to have a stronger bond.More importantly, it gives way to a broader creative prospect to express t hemselves as writers. Many writers create stories not to earn, but precisely to experience the joy of writing, something many known authors went through even in front the start of their careers. By writing fanfiction, people discover other writers who have the same interests. It promotes relationships among fans, and not just their creativity. Third, Hobb said that it lowers the ratings of their working. Fanfiction is a form of identicalness theft.Justin immediately responded to this by precept that fanfiction can be a form of literary criticism, and that when she despises these forms of fiction, she is taking these criticisms as personal judgments. Furthermore, the author of the blog added that fanfiction widens the readers of the work of these authors, especially when the fanfiction has been well written. Hobb continued that those who read fanfiction about Harry fiddle might get the wrong idea about the context of the series Justin said that majority of those who read Harr y Potter fanfiction are nearly likely those who have read or seen the works J.K. Rowling has authored. Fourth, the author said that fanfiction writers who create stories based from her work is in a way claiming her work, and cannot be right from any angle. Justin reacted that these writers are her readers, and that they are those who will be saying if her works have been productive or not, if she is a great writer or not. That is how the industry of writing is. One is not a successful writer if his reader was not happy about his story. Moreover, Justin added that reading is half the joy because all texts have different interpretations.Hobb can never realize that her readers will all have the same idea after reading her works. Everybody have different mind sets and different backgrounds, which can strongly concern how they read and understand a story. Furthermore, authors should feel privileged and honored that their works gained fanfictions because it goes to show that their st ories deeply touched the hearts and minds of these people that they respond in such a creative avenue. Fanfiction writers do not tell authors that they do a mistake, and that their works are ugly.In fact, they have become stimulate they just have different interpretations. Fifth, Hobb said the intent of the author is ignored. The original context was changed relationships, death, ending, and plot. Justin further emphasized that it was how the fan writers perceived their works. Nothing was written to spite the author. More importantly, nothing was written to close loose ends in the story. It is more of widening the possibilities in the story the what ifs and maybes the audience have en previseed during the blood line of the story.The works of the many authors are deeply loved and richly appreciated, cognise the time and effort they must have exerted to finish the novel or series of. Fanfiction writers are not holding any claim on it. Sixth, Hobb was told that fanfiction is an a ppropriate avenue to become a better writer. She responded by saying that if this was the truth, then karaoke creates singers and coloring books create artists. Justin just called her ludicrous. Among her arguments, this is by utmost the weakest.Of course, these are the avenues to discover talent. How else would you know if a child would be a painter if you wont give coloring books, a histrion without instruments, or a writer without books? Talent cannot be discovered without initiating its search. Seventh, to counter this, Hobb said that fanfiction is not a means to become a writer. By completely changing many aspects of the original context, this pretense of creating stories is not a good practice of writing.Justin responded to this by presenting examples like Max Ernest, Duchamps and Basquiat, Public Enemy, DJ Shadow and Negativeland, whose masterpieces must be considered as theft of intellectual property and be imprisoned. The original ideas of the authors are not stolen. They are, in way, taken into the next level. Eight, Hobb always emphasized that the original idea belongs to its creator, as Justin pointed out. However, not all plots are invented. Ideas are usually similar. They are only altered slightly, and it would seem different.In such a craft, ideas are not always new, but what matters is how it was approached and written. It usually boils down to the same theme. Critiques question craftsmanship and not the chief(prenominal) idea alone. These points highlight that Hobbs arguments against fanfiction are very weak and does not fully justify fanfiction as an illegal activity for fans. Plagiarism was not committed since fanfiction writers give full credit to the original authors. Moreover, these writers do not create fanfiction to earn, but simply to write and relate with other writers of the same interests. They write for growth and not selfish reasons.Hobb failed to give light to her legal and legitimate stand against fanfiction since her argume nts mainly concerned personal rants and close mind opinions. This paper initially stated that the points brought out in this paper cannot fully stand on either affirmative or opposition. However, based on the given text, this paper concludes that fanfiction is a legitimate activity for fans.Works Cited Justin. November 9, 2005. fanciful Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2. 5 Malaysia License. 27 December 2007 .