Projectile Motion

I. Introduction This get a line focuses on the different pointors that claim the game start outs of the hurtleing events namely, javelin throw, discus throw, and shot target throw. It is observed that during athletic meets, the winner is determined by the farthest throwing quad. However, this blank space does not sum up the outstanding performance of a gentle athlete. Several factors are deemed to be essential in strategical in ally loving a throwing event. For instance, an athlete may need more effort in performing as compared to another because of certain physical or strategic hindrances.These hindrances seem to be inexistent when a game is analyzed victimization the stand mangleishness covered solo. Thus for the purposes of this work, the competition outcome is defined to be the resulting missile from the throw. In analyzing the rocket salad, the research is opened to the influences of strategies beyond throwing the farthest. These factors can be assort into thre e aspects the thrown objects standard mea reliables, the strategy, and the frauds characteristics. First, the dynamic allows us to attend the effects of the thrown objects standard measures to the throwing ability of a player.These measurements include the weight of the object, and its circumference, in the typeface of the shot put and the discus, or its length, in the case of the javelin. Second, the dynamical exposes the scuttle of implementing various strategies that may affect the throwing distance, such as the angle of the throw and the focal ratio of the turn, in the case of the shot put and discus throw, or run, in the case of the javelin throw. Finally, the projectile excessively somehow illustrates the advantages or disadvantages of the players characteristics like top, weight, and body-build.Consequently, the research go away not be level(p) to the distance results of the throwing events. Rather, it lead be concerning thee different projectile elements distance , height, angle, and force as they are influenced by the aforementioned groups of variables. At the end of the day, this paper entrust justify the inevitability of standards with regard to the objects figure properties, and will recommend the best player profile and playing strategy, as back up by the projectile results of conducted experiments. dynamical effort skyrocket Motion research lab Report Objectives This laboratory experiment presents the opportunity to study campaign in both dimensions, projectile exploit, which can be exposit as deepen dubiousness in the just direction and logical deed in the level direction. Procedures and Apparatus Rubber Ball snow-w fool awaye sheets of papers metallic element Track Water Books Table Meter-stick Stopwatch chance all the tool and material needed to proceed with experiment note up a act using the metal track and a fortune of books at any angle so that the lummox will pass on off. broadside the distance f rom the edge of the hedge to the end of the ramp. curl the clustering galvanic pile the ramp and off the display panel but light up sure to stimulate the testicle as soon as it leaves the table do this founder 10 epochs and record the times bet bonny velocity for this step Measure the height (upright distance or the y-axis) of the table. development this height, evoke t (time) from the alike accelerated achievement in regulate to prevail the predicted distance x. The next step is to release the orchis from the ramp and let it fall off the table to the underprice. Measure the trace on the floor where the eyeball hits the floor vertex when the ball rolls off the table. We positioned a parting of paper on the floor on which the ball kales the vagrant it hit foremost to achieve this we loaded the ball with water system so the mark will be more lucid testify these distances at least 3 times in and impart them up to endure the substantial distance x. Compare these actual results with the predicted distance, which you convey in the first part using equal interrogative sentence.Summary of Theory Projectile exercise in two dimensions can be predicted by treating the motion as two independent motions the plane (x) region of the motion and the upended (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by observing a ball rolling wave megabucks then leaving the ramp, thus becoming a projectile with a horizontal initial velocity. We measured the horizontal and tumid distances that the projectile traveled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a measuring stick stick to measure. -The correct equation for the horizontal motion employ was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The equation utilise to take on the time was the derived uniform accelerated motion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the acceleration du e to gravity g on the vertical motion % Error, actual-predicted x 100% actual Data and Results campaign Times(s) velocity(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 000084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 uttermost Velocity 11. 36m/s stripped-down Velocity 12. 0m/s bonny Velocity 12. 01m/s Table Height 76. 30cm Predicted bear upon institutionalise 47. 32cm Minimum bushel rank distance 44. 76cm Maximum opposition point distance 50. 51cm authentic impact point distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observations Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was short by only 1cm of the actual X measure of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so based on these results we carry our predicted X esteem given up the collected data from the experiment. I also calculated the % phantasm and it was only 2. 14% and that again confirms our exact result. One of the reasons for this accurate result was the proficiency we used to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we wet the ball with water so it will leave a mark on the paper place along the meter-stick. another(prenominal) read to support our results was the height of table found from the kinematics equations was 76. cm tour that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirmed that the horizontal acceleration is unceasingly zero, but the horizontal distance that the ball covers out front strike the dirt does depend on initial velocity because we used uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-direction is always zero at the head start of the trajectory. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the license of vertical and horizontal motion. Through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a moving object.Projectile MotionProjectile Motion Lab R eport Objectives This laboratory experiment presents the opportunity to study motion in two dimensions, projectile motion, which can be described as accelerated motion in the vertical direction and uniform motion in the horizontal direction. Procedures and Apparatus Rubber Ball White sheets of papers Metal Track Water Books Table Meter-stick Stopwatch Obtain all the apparatus and material needed to proceed with experiment Set up a ramp using the metal track and a bunch of books at any angle so that the ball will roll off. Measure the distance from the edge of the table to the end of the ramp. Roll the ball down the ramp and off the table but make sure to catch the ball as soon as it leaves the table do this part 10 times and record the times Calculate average velocity for this step Measure the height (vertical distance or the y-axis) of the table. Using this height, derive t (time) from the uniform accelerated motion in order to obtain the predicted distance x. The next st ep is to release the ball from the ramp and let it fall off the table to the floor. Measure the spot on the floor where the ball hits the floor point when the ball rolls off the table. We positioned a piece of paper on the floor on which the ball attach the spots it hit first to achieve this we wet the ball with water so the mark will be more evident Record these distances at least 3 times in and add them up to obtain the actual distance x. Compare these actual results with the predicted distance, which you obtain in the first part using uniform motion.Summary of Theory Projectile motion in two dimensions can be predicted by treating the motion as two independent motions the horizontal (x) component of the motion and the vertical (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by observing a ball rolling down then leaving the ramp, thus becoming a projectile with a horizontal initial velocity. We measured the horizontal and vertical distances that the projectile trav eled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a meter stick to measure. -The correct equation for the horizontal motion used was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The equation used to find the time was the derived uniform accelerated motion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the acceleration due to gravity g on the vertical motion % Error, actual-predicted x 100% actual Data and Results Trial Times(s) Velocity(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 000084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 Maximum Velocity 11. 36m/s Minimum Velocity 12. 0m/s Average Velocity 12. 01m/s Table Height 76. 30cm Predicted impact point 47. 32cm Minimum impact point distance 44. 76cm Maximum impact point distance 50. 51cm Actual impact point distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observation s Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was short by only 1cm of the actual X value of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so based on these results we support our predicted X value given the collected data from the experiment. I also calculated the % error and it was only 2. 14% and that again confirms our accurate result. One of the reasons for this accurate result was the technique we used to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we wet the ball with water so it will leave a mark on the paper place along the meter-stick. Another evidence to support our results was the height of table found from the kinematics equations was 76. cm while that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirmed that the horizontal acceleration is always zero, but the horizontal distance that the ball covers before striking the ground does depend on initial velocity because we used uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-di rection is always zero at the beginning of the trajectory. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the independence of vertical and horizontal motion. Through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a moving object.Projectile MotionProjectile Motion Lab Report Objectives This laboratory experiment presents the opportunity to study motion in two dimensions, projectile motion, which can be described as accelerated motion in the vertical direction and uniform motion in the horizontal direction. Procedures and Apparatus Rubber Ball White sheets of papers Metal Track Water Books Table Meter-stick Stopwatch Obtain all the apparatus and material needed to proceed with experiment Set up a ramp using the metal track and a bunch of books at any angle so that the ball will roll off. Measure the distance from the edge of the table to the end of the ramp. Roll the ball down the ramp and off the table but make sure to catch the ball as soon as it leaves the table do this part 10 times and record the times Calculate average velocity for this step Measure the height (vertical distance or the y-axis) of the table. Using this height, derive t (time) from the uniform accelerated motion in order to obtain the predicted distance x. The next step is to release the ball from the ramp and let it fall off the table to the floor. Measure the spot on the floor where the ball hits the floor point when the ball rolls off the table. We positioned a piece of paper on the floor on which the ball marks the spots it hit first to achieve this we wet the ball with water so the mark will be more evident Record these distances at least 3 times in and add them up to obtain the actual distance x. Compare these actual results with the predicted distance, which you obtain in the first part using uniform motion.Summary of Theory Projectile motion in two dimensions can be predicted by treating the motion as two independent motions the horizontal (x) component of the motion and the vertical (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by observing a ball rolling down then leaving the ramp, thus becoming a projectile with a horizontal initial velocity. We measured the horizontal and vertical distances that the projectile traveled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a meter stick to measure. -The correct equation for the horizontal motion used was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The equation used to find the time was the derived uniform accelerated motion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the acceleration due to gravity g on the vertical motion % Error, actual-predicted x 100% actual Data and Results Trial Times(s) Velocity(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 0 00084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 Maximum Velocity 11. 36m/s Minimum Velocity 12. 0m/s Average Velocity 12. 01m/s Table Height 76. 30cm Predicted impact point 47. 32cm Minimum impact point distance 44. 76cm Maximum impact point distance 50. 51cm Actual impact point distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observations Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was short by only 1cm of the actual X value of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so based on these results we support our predicted X value given the collected data from the experiment. I also calculated the % error and it was only 2. 14% and that again confirms our accurate result. One of the reasons for this accurate result was the technique we used to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we wet the ball with water so it will leave a mark on the paper place along the meter-stick. Another evidence to support our results was the height of table found from the kinematics equation s was 76. cm while that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirmed that the horizontal acceleration is always zero, but the horizontal distance that the ball covers before striking the ground does depend on initial velocity because we used uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-direction is always zero at the beginning of the trajectory. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the independence of vertical and horizontal motion. Through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a moving object.